Our GOP
friends in the North Carolina Legislature are at it again. I guess it is considered being pro law enforcement to give the North Carolina Sheriff's Association whatever it wants even if it screws gun owners. Now they are trying to change our concealed carry laws from
shall issue to
may issue be allowing Sheriff's to deny a permit based on a lack of
good moral character.
SHERIFFS GRAB POWER TO DENY PERMITS
|
This is not a drill, and this is not a joke. Republicans in Raleigh are in the process of gutting NC’s “shall issue” concealed carry permit application structure...
Regarding concealed carry permit (CHP) applications, we are furious (yes,
furious ) to be forced to announce that
the
Republicans you sent to Raleigh have snuck language into the Proposed
Committee Substitute (PCS) of a bill that would, in essence, transform
North Carolina from a “SHALL ISSUE” state into a “MAY ISSUE” state.
We at GRNC are incensed and you ought to be as well. As you know,
GRNC engineered
NC's "shall issue" concealed carry law in 1995. Since then, GRNC has
been instrumental in greatly improving it with restaurant carry, limited
school/campus carry and more. We're not about to stand by and watch a
naked power grab by NC's sheriffs, aided by Republican senators, roll
back all of our progress.
Are You of “Good Moral Character?”
Last week, in Raleigh, Republicans snuck new language into a PCS for Senate Bill
S90("Protect Religious Meeting Places") (=
H110),
and it’s worth noting that, initially, S90 was not even written to deal
with the concealed carry application process. It’s also worth noting
that before the poisonous PCS, S90 was a promising pro-gun bill.
Yet, the PCS language strips “shall issue” status from the people and confers “may issue” power to your county sheriff.
According to the PCS, a sheriff can deny CHPs by claiming applicants
are not of “Good Moral Character,” the same shameful Jim Crow-era
language that still exists on Pistol Purchase Permit applications, which
GRNC has been fighting to eliminate.
And you’ve probably guessed already: there is no strict definition for “good moral character,” and truly, no definition would suffice in this context anyway. Therefore
(and conveniently), lacking “good moral character,” grounds for denying
a CHP, is an open-ended label that any sheriff could attach to any
applicant for any reason.
Shifting Power from Citizen to Sheriff
Lest
you wonder, “good moral character” has nothing to do with an
applicant’s criminal history. Exhaustive, indeed intrusive, criminal and
medical background checks, and (de facto) long waiting periods are
already part of the CHP application process. The sheriff’s personal, subjective and nebulous analysis of your character can have no legitimate purpose.
The only clear purpose of this language in S90’s PCS is to take power
away from you, the law-abiding citizen, and hand it to your county
sheriff to lord over you, so he can withhold your rights at will.
Perhaps
you’re thinking, “Sheriffs would never use this new power to deny
permits to qualified people.” Yet, if they’d never use their newfound
power, why enshrine it in our state’s laws? It can have only one
purpose, and if there is no intention to use it (now or later), it would
not have been proposed as substitute language for S90.
What You Can Do
Are
you prepared to live in a state that treats gun rights the way
California does—like “gun privileges?” Are you ready to cede your
Natural rights to your county’s sheriff, so he can ration them back to
you as he sees fit? If not, please join other gun rights supporters in
putting an immediate halt to this attack on your gun rights (from the
Republicans no less!). Once again, we must remind these politicians who “brung ‘em” to the dance, and it looks like we’ll have to be more stern than usual.
Below, see how you can easily contact Senate Judiciary Committee members (and Sen. Berger) to tell them, emphatically, that any
vote, indeed any support whatsoever, for S90’s Proposed Committee
Substitute will be considered a severe and blatant anti-gun action!
IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED!
|
- EMAIL MEMBERS OF THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE: Use the copy/paste email list provided below and the copy/paste text provided under ‘Deliver This Message.
- PHONE REPUBLICAN LEADERS & YOUR SENATOR: This
is serious and so phone calls to committee chairs and to your own
senator are just as important as sending an email message. Please use
the phone numbers provided below to contact Judiciary Committee leaders.
Also, please call your own senator (find contact details below). When
you reach each senator's office, tell him or her:
I am a
gun rights voter, and I am enraged that Republicans are seeking to
force a huge step backwards for gun rights in our state. The ostensibly
pro-gun party should be ashamed to be identified as the party that
introduced Senate Bill 90's PCS language, which would grant "may
issue" power to sheriffs for Concealed Carry Permits, stripping citizens
of the unalienable portion of unalienable rights. Any Senator
supporting this PCS will be considered anti-gun, and will pay at the
polls. Thank you.
- ATTEND TUESDAY'S COMMITTEE HEARING: The
presence of gun rights voters at this meeting is critical. Committee
members must know that we see what they're trying to do, and that we're
serious about stopping them. Please attend Tuesday's committee meeting. You may have an opportunity to speak, so arrive early in case you need to sign up. Find details below.
- PLEASE CONTRIBUTE TO GRNC: Help us fight gun control while we promote Second Amendment principles. Please CLICK HERE to
contribute. Bear in mind that GRNC is an all-volunteer organization, so
you can be sure your donations are put to the best possible use. Any
amount helps, and any amount is appreciated.
NC Senate Judiciary Committee, Copy/Paste Email List:
Dan.Bishop@ncleg.net;
Dan.Blue@ncleg.net;
Danny.Britt@ncleg.net;
Harry.Brown@ncleg.net;
Jim.Burgin@ncleg.net;
Warren.Daniel@ncleg.net;
Jim.Davis@ncleg.net;
Toby.Fitch@ncleg.net;
Kathy.Harrington@ncleg.net;
Rick.Horner@ncleg.net;
Brent.Jackson@ncleg.net;
Jeff.Jackson@ncleg.net;
Natasha.Marcus@ncleg.net;
Mujtaba.Mohammed@ncleg.net;
Paul.Newton@ncleg.net;
Terry.VanDuyn@ncleg.net;
Phil.Berger@ncleg.net
Senate Member |
Phone |
Senator Danny Britt, Jr.
Senate Judiciary Committee Co-chair |
(919) 733-5651 |
Senator Warren Daniel
Senate Judiciary Committee Co-chair |
(919) 715-7823 |
Senator Phil Berger
Senate President Pro Tempore |
(919) 733-5708 |
Please call your senator, too. Need name/contact information? Click Here and select the 'NC Senate' option to find your senator. |
Tuesday's Senate Judiciary Committee Attend to Stop the Gutting of Concealed Carry |
WHEN: |
Tuesday, June 18, 2019, 10:00 am |
WHERE: |
NCGA Legislative Building
Room 1124/1224
16 West Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27601 |
IMPORTANT NOTES: |
Please arrive early to allow extra time to park and to get through building security. |
|
Please dress for the press. Business attire preferred. Please no inflammatory slogans on clothing or otherwise. |
|
Please bring a roll-up paper sign with the following message on it:
"SENATOR BERGER: DON'T GUT CONCEALED CARRY" |
Suggested Subject: "
Don’t Gut Concealed Carry"
Dear Senator:
I have just learned of the Republican Party’s
effort to transform North Carolina’s concealed carry permit (CHP)
application structure from “shall issue” to “may issue.” I see that
Republican senators have snuck language into S90’s Proposed Committee
Substitute (PCS) that would grant sheriffs unchecked power to deny
concealed carry permits to any applicant, any time, for effectively any
reason. The PCS’s language, which poisons an otherwise pro-gun bill,
allows a sheriff to declare that an applicant, any applicant, is not of
“good moral character.” This is the same shameful Jim Crow-era language
that still exists on the Pistol Purchase Permit application, language
that ought to be removed (not added elsewhere).
Of course, “good
moral character” has no particular definition, nor would any be
satisfactory given the context. Exhaustive and intrusive background
checks and (de facto) long waiting periods are already part of the CHP
application process. The sheriff’s personal, subjective and nebulous
analysis of an applicant’s “character” has precisely zero legitimacy.
Clearly, its only purpose is to wrest power from the law-abiding citizen
and hand it to our county sheriffs to lord over the citizens, so
sheriffs can withhold Natural rights by fiat.
This is
unacceptable! I am incensed that the members of the Republican Party
would even consider such an anti-gun scheme. North Carolina is not
California, it is not New York, and gun voters will not allow this state
to transform into one of these states in the context of the recognition
of the Second Amendment.
Be warned:
Any favorable vote,
even the slightest measure of support for S90’s PCS, with its “good
moral character” clause, will be perceived as a threat to every gun
rights voter in this state, myself included. Do not doubt it, backing
S90’s PCS will be recorded as an extreme anti-gun action!
Put a
stop to S90’s anti-gun PCS now. I will be monitoring your actions on
this critical matter through alerts from Grass Roots North Carolina
Respectfully,
©
2019 Grass Roots North Carolina. All rights reserved. Reproduction and
distribution is permitted provided full attribution is given and the
item is reprinted in its entirety. Address questions to: President@GRNC.org