Bwahahaha

Democrats Reveal New Midterm Strategy: Drive Wedge Between Trump and Pro-2A Voters

I'm  sixt-five years old. All of my adult life a majority of Democrats have been after my Second Amentment rights. They pretended those rights were a collective right. I had no right to keep and bear arms. Look at any Democrat stronghold and the state of the Second Amendment in said stronghold. Fuck the Democrats. I'm better off with Trump. 

Okay, Then

DOJ Rules Century-Old Statute Prohibiting Shipping Handguns Through the US Mail Unconstitutional

I Understand Why Trump's Doing This

He's trolling the left for an expected response. My problem is he is creating precedents for the left. The red line for a mental health prohibition of gun possession should be an involuntary commitment issued by a judicial official and confirmed after evaluation by two doctors and a judge. Intended or not, this is a slippery slope we don't need. Whether we want to admit it or not, mass shootings, of the sort being used as an excuse here, are rare. They are outliers. You don't push legislation built on outliers. Again, I say, slippery slope. 

Trump Waited in the Tall Grass for This Moment on Gun Rights. It's Going to Be Brilliant.

Pointless Without A Filibuster Proof Majority

House Judiciary Committee to Take Up Concealed Carry Reciprocity on March 25

A Win for the Good Guys

Enormous Win for Veterans 2A Rights

Yet Another State Goes Constitutional Carry

Louisiana Becomes 28th Permitless Carry State, Gov Signs Into Law.

A Win for the Good Guys

Ninth Circuit Denies Rehearing En Banc of Panel Decision Holding Gun Ads Restriction Is Likely Unconstitutional

Of Course They Did

Appeals Court Allows California's Public Spaces Gun Ban to Go Into Effect

Strange Bedfellows

This NRA Supreme Court Case Has Big Implications for Porn

The ACLU is representing the NRA, and that's something I never thought I'd see.

Learning from Mistakes

Israeli Security Minister: We Are Approving ‘Up to 3,000’ Gun License Applications A Day

Good and Hard

The Supreme Court Should Not Let Bureaucrats Invent Crimes by Rewriting the Law

The Supreme Court has twice now told the EPA that they don't make law they enforce law and law id what the legislature says it is not the ATF. It's way past time the ATF and other Federal Agencies got that message good and hard.

We Need More of This...

...a lot more of this.

He Lost His Gun Rights Because of a Misdemeanor DUI Conviction. That Was Unconstitutional, a Judge Says.

"Military Grade Ammunition"

Jernalizm: The NY Times’ Bumbling Attempt to Blame an Ammo Maker for Mass Shootings

The latest term of art to scare folk into supporting gun control and it is gun control. Ammunition is as protected by the Second Amendment as is a firearm. One is intragel to the other. I can't shoot a gun if I don't have bullets. More bullshit from the anti-gun New York Times for their anti-gun audience.

Beginning of the End

Federal judge blocks suspension of right to carry firearms in public ordered by New Mexico governor

When even Democrats are calling you out, you know you f**ked up. She F**ked up.

Even a Broken Clock...

“There is no such thing as a state public health emergency exception to the U.S. Constitution.”

Mark this as the first time we’ve ever quoted David Hogg without a rebuttal. https://t.co/aib8IdKo50

— Not the Bee (@Not_the_Bee) September 9, 2023

Impeach Her

Breaking: New Mexico Governor Suspends the Second Amendment

Let's do things that will have no effect on the "gun violence" problem and call it progress. I predict no impact at all on New Mexico's gun violence homicide problem. Typical for a Democrat.

When You Lose by Every Other Avenue...

...lie. States Attack Private Shooting Ranges as ‘Antigovernment Paramilitary Training Camps’.

And Because of That, They Lie

There Is No Firm, Sustained Support for Gun Control

Like the Gun Haters Even Care

Strong Majority of Americans Approve of Supreme Court Decisions That Expand, Protect Their Gun Rights

Alberta Tells Trudeau to Pound Sand...

...on guns.

Canadian Province Says No

“The decision to ban over 1,500 models of different firearms, simply because the “style” of the firearm was deemed to be aesthetically displeasing, is offensive and suggests to us that you are uninterested in meaningfully addressing gun crime,” the response reads.