10 dead and 15 injured in mass stabbing, suspects still at large
Sunday, September 4, 2022
Thursday, September 16, 2021
Monday, August 30, 2021
Saturday, August 21, 2021
Thursday, October 29, 2020
Thursday, September 24, 2020
Monday, September 17, 2018
That might clear up a few questions...
Republican Representative Calls For Members Of Congress To Be Drug Tested
Sunday, December 27, 2015
It worked for Bill.
Jim Webb hopes to decide on independent bid by New Year'sHe's gonna run as an independent. None of the left wing nut jobs of the Democrat party will vote for him. He is a centrist. At best, he'll draw independents from the the center right and thus draw votes from the GOP nominee who sure the hell won't be Trump. Trump will also run as an independent drawing votes from the right. Who wins? Hillary. That's the only hope in hell she has to win and I think that was the plan all along. It worked for her husband during his first run. Remember Perot?
Saturday, August 23, 2014
Police and "military style weapons".
NYT poll: 65% of whites, 80% of blacks say police shouldn’t have military-style weaponsThe issue I have with militarization of the police isn't with the toys they have with one exception which I'll get to in a bit. The problem is the police are paramilitary organizations and too many emphasize the military rather than the para. Police officers call the people they serve civilians like they themselves aren't. They see themselves as better than the people the serve. That's the core problem with this militarization of the police. I have no problem with law enforcement using armored vehicles to provide cover for officers during a riot. Same for semi-automatic rifles, military grade body armor, or helmets.
I do have a problem when departments use SWAT teams armed with these items to serve search warrants that are no more high risk than crossing the street. The problem isn't the equipment the local police have. It's the attitude that comes with it, and that's the militarization of which we need to be wary.
Which brings me to that exception I spoke of earlier. I DO have a problem with police having automatic and/or select fire weapons when the local population can't or they are so regulated that it is next to impossible for us "civilians" to get them. If I can't have a magazine that holds more than ten rounds they don't need them. If they need some item to defend themselves then an argument can be made that the "civilian" population needs them as well. Whatever regulation I'm subjected to should apply to the police as well, because they aren't above us. They are us.
Wednesday, December 18, 2013
It seems to me that if you wanted to compare...
Sunday, December 15, 2013
Right after you cut them for other Federal employees...
Ryan Defends Reduction to Cost-of-Living Adjustments for Early Military Retirees



