data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/caeb4/caeb40a0016d9de5b2582db675bfc7e6a39d3d93" alt=""
From John Cox
According to ATF’s Tracing Center, 90 percent of the firearms about which ATF receives information are traceable to the United States.Today I read this over at Sipsey Street Irregulars. Go read both then do the math and see if two plus two equals four. I believe Ogden is being truthful. Ninety percent of the Mexican guns traced by the ATF do come from the United States. Only they're not coming through gun shops or gun shows. They're weapons sold to the Mexican government with the permission of the the United States government that then found their way into the hands of the cartels. David is right. Officials within the United States Government are telling half-truths with the intent of depriving us of our rights. He calls it...
outright conspiratorial fraudI agree. So what are we going to do about it?
A lone gunman burst into a North Carolina nursing home Sunday morning and started "shooting everything," barging into the rooms of terrified patients, sparing some from his rampage without explanation while killing seven residents and a nurse caring for them.The shooter is in custody and charged with eights counts of first degree murder. the weapon used was a deer rifle. My condolences to the families of the slain.
Authorities said Robert Stewart also wounded three others, including the Carthage police officer who confronted him in a hallway of Pinelake Health and Rehab and stopped the brutal attack.
The locking mechanisms [required by the statute] are the functional equivalent of those enumerated in the D.C. statute struck down in Heller.I know that in reality what happens in a local Massachusetts trial court means jack in the North Carolina courts, but maybe the argument would hold in regard to the proposed Rapist Protection Acts part one and part deux. Just a thought.
In Heller, the Court held that the Second Amendment not only protects an individual's right to possess firearms but that the right requires that the firearms be available for "the purpose of immediate self-defense." The Massachusetts statute mandating lock boxes or similar devices would frustrate an owner's ability to immediately access an operable weapon.
Although the statute exempts firearms that are "carried" or "under the control of the owner" from the requirement that they be locked, the statute applies to the lawful owner of a firearm even when he is at home. People can be subject to prosecution whether they are home or not. The term "under the control of the owner" is a question of fact and subject to interpretation. Any ambiguity in the statute as applied to a person lawfully keeping a firearm in the home must be resolved in favor of the holder of the right. Legislation requiring an owner to store firearms in a place inaccessible to children or unauthorized persons would satisfy the Supreme Court's holding in Heller and protect the safety of others.
In light of the foregoing, the Court finds that, based on the Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. Heller, G.L.c. 140, sec. 131L is unconstitutional.
Apparently in some cultures - namely the NC Senate - if you have a really bad idea then you try it twice... at the same time. At least that seems to be Sen. Malcolm Graham's thinking in introducing SB 987, SB 664's nearly identical twin. The second edition of the Rapist Protection Act is pretty much the same as SB 664 with the exception that it also would require signs in gun stores to threaten potential gun buyers about this measure.Call or write your State representatives and ask them to vote against this bill.
Like SB 664, SB 987, the Rapist Protection Act Volume II, is the reincarnation of the Rapist Protection Act which anti-gunners attempted to enact back in 2001. The bill at that time came from the House in the guise of HB 320. Research has shown that mandatory storage laws lead to increases in rapes, murders and aggravated assaults. This is due to an increased sense of safety "on the job" experienced by the criminal
element. Who do you wish to feel safer in your home, you or uninvited violent criminals?
Saturday, March 28, 2009 at 8:30 pm, local time. I’m thinking about lighting the place up and checking load balance on my house distribution panel with all the burners on the stove lit, the central heat on, and maybe just idling the car in the drive.These environmentalist wackos aren't going to be happy until every liberty we have is ground under the heel of saving the earth. The environmental movement has been high jacked by Marxists. They can't win with a direct assault on Capitalism so they try to flank us with this global warming bullshit. So I'm going to crank up everything I can tonight and vote for freedom and against these one world, Marxist-Leninist fucktards.
Hippy a**holes!
Opponents, among them a number of influential business groups, argue the bill is an affront to an employer’s property rights and are wary of potential gun violence as a growing number of Texans lose their jobs....and there was going to be blood in the streets and shoot-outs everywhere when concealed carry laws passed in [name state of choice].
If the results of an online poll are any indication, NASA may soon be naming a new wing of the International Space Station, Node 3, after late-night comedian Stephen Colbert.Damn, damn, damn.
According to the Associated Press, write-ins for "Colbert" crushed all of NASA's four poll options, pulling in 230,539 votes; the second-place choice, NASA suggestion "Serenity" (a nod to sci-fi hero Joss Whedon) was more than 40,000 votes behind. Writer Dave Barry also threw his hat in the ring, suggesting "Buddy" as the perfect name for Node 3. But he didn't amass nearly enough support.
Watching this administration is like watching two blind octopoids attempting menage a trois with bagpipes. It's very funny at first, but you know it's going to end in a tragic disaster--and we're the bagpipes.
--Michael Z. Williamson
Few gun control proposals more clearly reveal the ultimate intention to disarm American citizens than those which punish lawful gun owners for the crimes of others. Imagine a mandatory gun storage law which would make you criminally liable for guns stolen from you, even if you stored them under lock and key ...Call your State Senator and let him know you oppose this piece of legislation.
Two armed men barged into the store around 9:30 p.m. but their plan to hit the store and run off was foiled.
Two customers and a cashier started punching the robbers. The robbers fired off shots striking the men, but they wouldn't stop fighting.
Eventually one suspect escaped but the heroes were able to hold on to one robber, grab his gun and subdue him until Oakland Police got on the scene.
...
One victim was shot in the chest, another in the neck and the last one in the arm.
The store owner says the injuries weren't serious and that they are all in good condition.
The judge’s decision underscores how difficult it is in the United States to convict a gun dealer of wrongdoing in connection with the illegal flow of weapons to Mexico.Not if you have evidence and can convince a judge that you have a case which Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard did not.
Two US navy vessels, including a nuclear-powered submarine, collided in one of the Middle East's key oil routes today lightly injuring 15 sailors and causing oil prices to rise.Two naval vessels collided and suffered damage and injuries to personnel. They happened to be in the strait of Hormuz.
However there was no disruption to shipping in the strait following the collision.So if Ahmadinejad farts are you gonna raise the price again? I'm a firm believer in the free market. I'm just constantly amazed at what effects the market.
I just received a phone call from the office of U.S. Senator Tester of Montana to inform me that at 5:15 (EST) today a letter cosigned by Senator Tester (D-MT) and Senator Baucus (D-MT) was faxed to the Department of Defense asking DoD to reverse its new policy requiring destruction of fired military cartridge brass. At 5:30, I am told, Tester's office received a fax back from DoD saying that the brass destruction policy IS reversed.
What are the marks of a sick culture?Considering my tendency towards profanity on this blog, this gives me a bit to think about. Am I gonna stop cussing? Probably not but I'll think about it.
It is a bad sign when the people of a country stop identifying themselves with the country and start identifying with a group. A racial group. Or a religion. Or a language. Anything, as long as it isn't the whole population.
A very bad sign. Particularism. It was once considered a Spanish vice but any country can fall sick with it. Dominance of males over females seems to be one of the symptoms.
Before a revolution can take place, the population must loose faith in both the police and the courts.
High taxation is important and so is inflation of the currency and the ratio of the productive to those on the public payroll. But that's old hat; everybody knows that a country is on the skids when its income and outgo get out of balance and stay that way - even though there are always endless attempts to wish it way by legislation. But I started looking for little signs and what some call silly-season symptoms.
I want to mention one of the obvious symptoms: Violence. Muggings. Sniping. Arson. Bombing. Terrorism of any sort. Riots of course - but I suspect that little incidents of violence, pecking way at people day after day, damage a culture even more than riots that flare up and then die down. Oh, conscription and slavery and arbitrary compulsion of all sorts and imprisonment without bail and without speedy trial - but those things are obvious; all the histories list them.
I think you have missed the most alarming symptom of all. This one I shall tell you. But go back and search for it. Examine it. Sick cultures show a complex of symptoms as you have named... But a dying culture invariably exhibits personal rudeness. Bad manners. Lack of consideration for others in minor matters. A loss of politeness, of gentle manners, is more significant than a riot.
This symptom is especially serious in that an individual displaying it never thinks of it as a sign of ill health but as proof of his/her strength. Look for it. Study it. It is too late to save this culture - this worldwide culture, not just the freak show here in California. Therefore we must now prepare the monasteries for the coming Dark Age. Electronic records are too fragile; we must again have books, of stable inks and resistant paper.
Friday and Dr. Baldwin in Friday
_Finland announced plans Wednesday to impose stricter restrictions on firearms, including raising the minimum age for handgun ownership from 15 to 20. The proposal was prompted by two school massacres within a year in which lone gunmen opened fire on classmates and teachers.I'd like to make some snide comment on expecting no less in Europe but then it's kinda hard when in places like California, Massachusetts, New York City, and Chicago many of the changes Europe is considering already exist.
_Germany, where a gunman killed at least 11 people Wednesday, raised the legal age for owning recreational firearms from 18 to 21 following a 2002 shooting in Erfurt that killed 16 people, including 12 teachers.
_Belgian lawmakers passed strict new gun control laws in 2006 in reaction to the racially motivated shooting deaths of a toddler and her black baby sitter in Antwerp.
_Swiss citizens are demanding a referendum aimed at confining army weapons to military compounds and banning private purchases of pump-action rifles and automatic weapons — following a spate of suicides and homicides.
_The Portuguese Parliament is currently discussing a government proposal to tighten gun laws, including denying bail to anyone suspected of a gun crime.
_Denmark's government said last week it will raise the penalty for illegal gun possession as part of a crackdown on gang violence that has killed three people and injured 25 in recent months.
_European Union lawmakers proposed tighter gun control across the bloc last year, including guidelines saying that only people over 18 not deemed a threat to public safety could buy and keep guns. EU members have until 2010 to adopt the measures.
Mexico's ambassador to the United States, Arturo Sarukhan, has noted that as many as 2,000 weapons enter Mexico from the U.S. every day -- most of them through Texas and Arizona, and many of them are purchased legally at gun shows and gun stores.but some in the US Press are opening their eyes a bit.
Most of these weapons are being smuggled from Central American countries or by sea, eluding U.S. and Mexican monitors who are focused on the smuggling of semiauto- matic and conventional weapons purchased from dealers in the U.S. border states of Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and California.
Legislators in Southwestern states concerned about drug violence in Mexico spilling across the border recommended tighter gun control and stronger law enforcement yesterday.Let's tighten gun control along the border and make it harder for U.S. Citizens to get guns and ammo to defend themselves from drug violence coming over the border. Why? Because of the unproven assertion that the machine guns and grenades being used in the ongoing drug war are being sold by gun shops in the southwestern states. Why would a drug lord on Forbes list of billionaires buy from local gun shops when bribes to the Mexican police and military have oh much less paperwork?
The boy is not expected to face charges. A sheriff's deputy says he's "a good kid" who was trying to help people in need.What, Mister Deputy, would you charge him with? What crime did he commit? Larceny? Wouldn't the drug dealer have to file that complaint? Maybe failing to turn found drug money over to the Sheriff's Department so y'all can add it to your budget through civil forfeiture? That sounds about right. Yeah, go arrest him.
I had the shotgun to deter him from going any further. I thought of putting a shot in the air, but I didn’t intend to aim a shot at him.An armed intruder broke Kenneth Batchelor's home with the intent to do him harm and by sheer luck Batchelor shot and killed the intruder. His luck continued because the jury found him not guilty. Why was this luck? In North Carolina he wouldn't have even been charged. This took place in England where I thought self-defense was essentially illegal. Jury nullification? I doubt it. My vote stays with sheer luck.
“Clements said: ‘I’ll get my gun out before you can raise them barrels.’
Mr Batchelor told the court that Mr Clements had “smashed into the window”, knocking him backwards.
“I fell back and snatched at the trigger and the gun has gone off,” he said.
The answer to gun violence is not more guns. Alabama has one of the highest gun ownership rates in the nation -- more than 57 percent ofAnd Illinois has some of the most restrictive gun laws in the country and yet a pastor was murdered in his own church with a semi-automatic pistol, or should I call it an assault pistol, despite those laws. In Germany 15 people were shot to death despite restrictive gun laws. Yeah I know, they're not restrictive enough. Truth is they don't work and as I said your need to capitalize on the tragedy of others shows you for the sons of bitches you are.
the state's households have guns -- and some of the weakest gun laws in the country.
Do the recent shooting rampages highlight the need for more gun control?Go vote.
A gunman killed 15 people in a shooting spree in two small towns near Stuttgart, Germany, officers say.Another shooting with 15 dead. The shootings took place in a local school. The shooter was shot by police. they don't know if the fatal wounds were from police or self-inflicted. He obtained the weapon from his father's collection. According to the story Germany has fairly restrict gun laws that require the owner to keep them secured. I also hazard a guess that carrying a weapon for self-defense is prohibited and that the schools are gun free zones. So how'd that work out for you?
A gunman went on a shooting spree in two neighboring south Alabama towns Tuesday, killing nine people before he shot himself at a metals plantHere is another report and another. With this, the second shooting this week, I'm expecting the usual suspects to start trying to capitalize on the tragedies to push their agenda. My hope is that they will hold off and give the victim's families time to grieve before they become the latest poster children for gun control.
Do we really need a gun-fashion police?
New York City on Monday failed before the U.S. Supreme Court to revive a lawsuit it filed against the gun industry.H/T to Thirdpower
The Gun Lobby's Amendment to D.C. Voting Rights Bill Would Gut the District's Gun LawsThis is a bad thing?
MARYVILLE, Ill. (March 8) -- A pastor shot and killed during his Sunday sermon deflected the first of the gunman's four rounds with a Bible, sending a confetti-like spray of paper into the air in a horrifying scene that congregants initially thought was a skit, police said.My condolences to the paster's family and the members of the church.
Two congregants tackled the gunman as he pulled the 4-inch knife, and all three were stabbed, police said. The gunman suffered "a pretty serious wound to the neck" while one congregant had lower back wounds...
Terry Lee Atkins was shot in the chest and then went to two homes nearby looking for help.Either the victim didn't have enough gun or he/she needs to spend more time at the range and tighten his/her group. In any event, his/her efforts were good enough and, for a short time at least, we have one less son of a bitch roaming the streets.
While responding, the officer drew his gun and accidentally discharged the weapon into the ground," said UIC spokesman Mark Rosati.Accidental discharge my ass. The officer violated rule #3. That's negligence. He had the muzzle pointed at the ground. That was the accident. He's damn lucky he didn't kill someone.
...report, Ortiz yelled at the officers from the elevator when they tried to break up the disturbance.But when the Prosecutor saw this video he first reduced the charge then dismissed it as an unprosecutable case. The victim's attorney commented
Ortiz "walked right up to me hitting his nose to my nose," Lade wrote, adding that he pushed Ortiz.
"As I approached Ortiz to take him into custody, Ortiz spun around to face me and assumed a fighting stance (both left and right hand clenched into fists and body bladed)," he wrote.
the officers embellished their reports to justify their aggression without knowing the videotape existed.The Fort Lauderdale Police Internal Affairs unit investigated the matter and gave the officers a pass: no violations of policy or procedure. Embellishing the facts or lying in a police report was apparently not a violation of policy or procedure.
Most of the guns used in crimes are purchased and possessed illegally, often by people with criminal records.True but your proposals like all gun control measures don't effect the criminals ability to obtain a gun. They prevent law abiding citizens from buying guns. Lip service aside your goal is to make it impossible for any private citizen to own a firearm unless they are filthy rich or a celebrity.
The vast majority of Americans and gun owners support efforts to keep guns out of the hands of criminals, but the issue is stuck in the muck of Washington politics.Yes most people want to keep guns out of the hands of felons but not at their own expense.
But mayors from around the country aren't waiting for federal action.No they're hiring private detectives to violate Federal law by making straw purchases in an attempt to entrap gun shops into selling guns illegally. That would be you Michael.
If the nation's local police officers - nearly 500,000 strong - had full access to this data, we could map the illegal gun trafficking market and direct police resources to the small percentage of irresponsible dealers fueling it.They do have full access you fucks. Law Enforcement can access the trace date through the ATF. You Mayors on the other hand do not have that access and I can really see where that might piss you off since it kinda puts a stumbling block in the way of your attempts to put gun shops out of business through endless litigation.
But there is a glaring loophole in the law: Background checks are not required at gun shows, in too many instances. This means that criminals can easily purchase guns at gun shows - no questions asked.Oh this would be the "gun shop loophole". You lie. Gun dealers are required to run a NICS check for all sales at all gun shows just like out of their stores. Your intent is to end is private sales that may or may not occur at a gun show. You want to force private gun owners to sell their personal property through a third party so you can track it.
End the fire sales: The ATF rarely shuts down dealers for violations of the law, but when it does, those dealers are permitted to sell off their inventory - without doing background checks!This is a new one to me. To my knowledge all sales to individuals have to go through the NICS system, and the idea that the BATFE would turn a blind eye to such sales is an insult to an agency that is all too easily rightfully insulted. I would assume that you are referring to sales to other dealers which would not require a background check. I admit my knowledge on this one is lacking but this claim like most of the others here doesn't pass the smell test. These twits think that if they continually spout the same lies that we'll start to believe them and cooperate. Ain't gonna happen...ever.
Obamanfreude - 1. taking pleasure from the discomfort of Obama supporters as they come to realize that The Chosen One™ is just another Chicago politician. 2. taking pleasure from the misfortunes of an Obama supporter as he or she is adversely affected by the policies of their Dear Leader.Thanks Tam
Surprise Asteroid Makes Near-Miss of EarthOk, get off my ass, buy rifle and ammo, hunker down, Lucifer's Hammer is coming.
A small asteroid buzzed by Earth Monday, though only real astronomy geeks in the Pacific would have noticed.
The rock, estimated to be no more than 200 feet wide, zoomed past our planet at an altitude of 40,000 miles at 1:44 p.m. universal time — or 8:44 EST.
Speaking of drug war violence in Mexico, Arizona’s attorney general kinda’, sorta’, almost brings himself to say it might possibly be time to at least start talking about the possibility of opening up a debate on . . . legalizing marijuana. I think I put enough caveats in there.This is the story to which he was referring.
Mexico has a gun problem, just like they have a drug problem and both the U.S. and Mexican governments are trying to place the blame on U.S. gun owners. U.S. gun owners aren't the problem. Mexico is the problem. The government is corrupt from the lowest level law enforcement officer shaking down American tourists for traffic violations, to officials and politicians highly placed within the Mexican government, including elements within the military. Everyone knows it. Everyone in Mexico knows it. Every law enforcement official in the U.S. knows it, and everyone in our government knows it. And anyone who has worked for any length of time within border cities and lived in the local community knows it. This is taking a Mexican problem, blaming the U.S. by turning it into a crisis in order further an agenda, and Eric Holder and President Obama knows it and they are taking advantage of it.
Gov. Timothy M. Kaine said today he would veto legislation passed by the General Assembly yesterday that would allow holders of concealed weapons permits to bring their hidden guns into establishments that serve alcohol. “I’m very nervous about the public safety impact of that bill,“ the governor said...There seems to be this meme going around among gun haters that we can't trust concealed carry permit holders inside restaurants that serve alcohol. Ya know they get drunk and shoot the place up. The fact is there is nothing to stop permit holders getting drunk someplace other than a restaurant and shooting the place up but ya know what? It hasn't happened. Concealed Carry Permit Holders are responsible Gov. Kaine and aren't likely to drink and carry anymore than they are drink and drive. If you don't have it already up there in Virginia, why don't ya'll pass a law that prohibits anyone from carrying a firearm while under the influence of alcohol and let those that do carry go into restaurants that serve alcohol as long as they don't imbibe? What? Not reasonable enough for ya?