We conclude that the policy favoring the right of self-defense is a public policy of sufficient clarity and weight to qualify as an exception to the at-will employment doctrine.So as I read it a Wal-Mart employee exercised h is right to self-defense while on Wal-Mart clock and they canned him for a policy violation. The Utah court says his right to self-defense trumps their right to employee whom they chose. I choose to see this as a good thing.
Saturday, September 19, 2015
A Win...
Labels:
gun rights litigation
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment